Family Bloodline
Tribal Repatriation
CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA
Cuthaugula Coahuila The Tribe Of Two Lands
Dear Family,
I, Thomas Earl Lee better known as Lusa-Kio Yakaba, Minko of the Cuthaugula Coahuila Tribe, son of Earliene Mary Colter and Thomas Edward Lee. I am a representative of the bloodline family surnames of Lee, Perry, Cooper, French, Dumas, Colter, Gilmore and all those who connect to the bloodline tree of my Ancestors. I through the authority of the Creator created and formulated Cuthaugula Coahuila as a family tribal nation state for the purpose to legally protect our family freedom and rights as indigenous people of the land. As a family tribal trust charter, the goal is to reorganize into a tribal family institution as a means to free ourselves from the colonizing forces on our ancestral lands.
With the on going fear of forced vaccines we have created a safe haven for independent tribal thought and procedures regarding our own health care choices and resources based on what we know is good and right for us . I, Lusa-Kio invite all who are connected to me through blood and common ancestry to stand as one within our own bloodline sovereign nation state an a means to control our own future and destiny.
Every man and woman is the chief of their own house and play a crucial roll in the tribal family order. The social order of our community is naturally laid out within the bloodline, parents are the chiefs of their own house i.e. clan, grandparents are the chiefs of their extended clans. A clan is a single household, a tribe is more the one clan and a nation is more then one tribe.
Requirements: $1,500
- Family bloodline Affidavit
- Sign a nondisclosure agreement
- Tribal membership application
- Each tribal family enrollment includes two tribal identification card for the signing chief.
- Each additional Identification card will cost $35
CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA
TRIBAL TRUST CHARTER
Constructive and Public Notice
Principle Registry # 2018-0055432
Clerk of Superior Court
Fulton County, Georgia
I, Kio-Lusa Yakaba, for the posterity of the beneficiaries, provide this Notice, giving credence to the natural born aborigine blood of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA, descendants of CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA aborigine natural inhabitants of America, Turtle Island. This Notice brings forth the legal and lawful standing and status of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA established by the bloodlines of CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA Ancestors, now filed with your office for the purpose of official notification of aborigine and tribal standing.
This is lawful Notice and is sent pursuant to your promise and your institutions policy to uphold the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth and Tenth Articles in Amendments to Constitution for the United States of America Republic, and pursuant to your Oath, requires your written response specific to subject matter. Your failure to respond, as stipulated, and rebut, with particularity, everything in this Notice with which you disagree, is your lawful, legal and binding agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this Notice is true, correct, legal, lawful and binding upon you and your agency i.e. United States Department of Energy, Department of Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairs in any court of law, without your protest or objection or that of those who represent you. “Silence is a species of conduct, and constitutes an implied representation of the existence of facts in question. When silence is of such character and under such circumstances that it would become a fraud, it will operate as an Estoppel.” Carmine v. Bowen, 64 U.S. 932; “Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit… includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public,… and if he deliberately conceals material information from them he is guilty of fraud.” McNally v. U.S., 483 U.S. 350, 371-372, Quoting U.S. v Holzer, 816 F.2d. 304, 307.Your silence is your acquiescence to the truth and evidence of the Constructive Notice. See: Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391. Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law”. See also: U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d.297; “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” Please take NOTICE and respond to the following truths:
CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA Clan, from the land of North America, whose various members and families are enrolled tribal peoples, with various members recognized by the United States through ancestral records of American Aborigine-Indian enrollment and Federal government records, primarily United States Congress establishment of the Camp Holmes Treaty, Department of Energy [Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)] records and data systems records, having filed this “Constructive and Public Notice” of existence of the “ CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA TRIBAL TRUST”, a natural living tribal trust, chartered and established under the authority of CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA tribe; the corpus of the Trust is perpetual with the duration of Mother Earth; and is established in association with the Hague Trust Convention, established international treaties and the UNDRIP..
This honorable, respectful, and proper “Constructive and Public Notice” formally initiates the genuine efforts of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA Tribe to engage and establish its lawful, political, and legal status, intentions, and standing with regard towards coexisting in the shared territorial boundaries of America.
Excerpt from Trust Charter
TRIBAL TRUST CHARTER OF THE
CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA
TURTLE ISLAND TERRITORY
Whereas, the said CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA clans people, by Tribal Trust Charter resolution of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA Tribal Trust Council of, on, and within the ancestral lands of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA, within the tribal territories of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA now currently known as “State of Louisiana and Texas” on Turtle Island and known to the world communities as America; a treaty beneficiary of the Treaty of Camp Holmes. Documentation of identity and standing as American Aborigine, established herein via declarations in claims filed against the United States Department of Commerce on December 26, 2014, which met the United Nations Sustainable Development 2015 Agenda concerning claims deadlines against the United States, and responded to by the United States Inspector General for order of identity correction (February 6, 2015, Complaint Number 15-0387 U.S. Department of Commerce). Validations and trust authorizations are also found and declared within the birth records of Mylus French SR And Sylvia (Johnson) French married and had Joe Langston, Susan, George Ann, Sam, John, Isabella, Milus Pete French JR. Milus Pete French JR married Mary Dumas and had Hilkon French, Athen, Elkon French, Hazel French, Esther French, Vera French, Louise French, Ezra French SR, Moses French SR, Zelma French.
John Henry, Lauren Burrell, Emmoline Henry, Daply Cooper, Martin Cooper, Emma Cooper, Laurender Cooper, Louis Cooper, Gina Cooper, Alice Cooper and Rebecca Cooper, Joseph Cooper, Delia Cooper, Solomon Peary, Eddie Peary, Samuel Peary, Willie Peary and Alice Lee.
David Gilmore, Sallie Bell, Dempsy Gilmore, Pearl Gilmore, Samuel Colter, Alma Colter, Charlston Colter, Bruno Colter, Ruby Colter and Morine Colter. Morine Culter, Earl Colter.
The CHAKCHIUMA NATION of Arkansas settlement ancestral bloodline connection Mulis French who married Rena Ames, and had Isabela French and Milas French Jr. Milus French Jr married Mary Dumas and had twelve children: Hilkon French, Athen, Elkon French, Hazel French, Esther French, Vera French, Louise French, Ezra French SR, Moses French SR, Zelma French. Zelma French married Earl Colter and had Earlene Colter. Earlene Colter-Arnold had for chlidren Loletta Lamar-Brown, Shawn Cavness , Johnice Arnold and Thomas Earl Lee. Thomas Lee had adopted Zsamine Hopkins and after had Zyaun Uriyah Lee and Niara Simone Lee.
John Henry and Lauren Burrell of the CUTHAUGULA Natives ( Now Louisiana Catahoula Perish) had one child name Emmoline Henry who married Daply Cooper and had seven children: Martin Cooper, Emma Cooper, Laurender Cooper, Louis Cooper, Gina Cooper, Alice Cooper and Rebecca Cooper. Rebecca Cooper had seven children, Joseph Cooper, Delia Cooper, Solomon Peary, Eddie Peary, Samuel Peary, Willie Peary and Alice Lee. Alice Lee had four children, Allen Hoskins, Barbara Lee, Thomas Edward Lee, Sharon Lee. Thomas Lee had two children, Thomas Earl Lee and Ashly Lee. Thomas Earl Lee married Desha Hopkins and had two children, Tamara Payn and had one child. Thomas and Desha had two children, Zsamine Hopkins Lee and Zyaun Uriyah Lee. Thomas and Tamara had one child, Niara Simone Lee. Thomas Earl Lee Married Shenece Shenean Scott and adopted her family members, Ashley Symone Scott , Winston Hieri Scott I, Whitley Deneshia Lorece Scott, Leilani Mia Scott, Winston Hieri Scott II, Emma Jean Treadway Scott.
David Gilmore and Sallie Bell of the COAHUILA Natives ( Now known as Texas Territory) had two children Dempsy Gilmore and Pearl Gilmore. Pearl Gilmore Married Samuel Colter and had four children ,Alma Colter, Charlston Colter, Bruno Colter, Ruby Colter and Morine Colter. Morine Culter had one Child, Earl Colter. Earl Culter married Zion French and had one child Earlene Colter (Joy Arnold) who had four children Loletta Lamar, Shawn Cavness, Johnice Arnold and Thomas Earl Lee. Loletta Lamar married Alvin Brown and had five children, Alvin Oral Brown III, Daniel Earl Brown, Jacob Aaron Brown, Lawrence Anderson Brown and Darius Paul Brown. Alvin Oral Brown III , had two children, Isabelle Grace Brown and Alvin Jeremiah Brown. Daniel Earl Brown had two children, Daniel Earl Brown Jr and Joshua Christian Brown. Jacob Aaron Brown had one child, Desmond Devonn Brown.
All names above are recognized as “American Indian”, victims of fraud, identity theft and misidentification, and herein reclassified via the 1967 repealed doctrine of the Racial Integrity Act of 1924 adopted by the states and applied in conjunction with the destructive “One Drop Rule of 1910”, all of which unfolded with the ruling of Loving vs. Virginia. including all natural lands formally and currently inhabited by the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA TRIBE and lands located within the boundaries of the tribal territories of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA, which are herein claimed as intellectual and real property of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA TRIBE Tribal Trust on Turtle Island including,
Latitude 36.27893 N, Longitude 115.17255 W, Latitude 30.9843° N, Longitude 91.9623° W, Latitude 31.9686° N , Longitude 99.9018° W,
which is known to the world communities as America. The established tribal council provides documentation of history, identity and American Aborigine standing and identity of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA via the following: Racial Integrity Act repealed in 1967, NAAIP International Affidavit and Notice of Constructive Fraud Identity Theft, Unlawful Conversion, Economic Deception and Ethnic Cleansing; misidentification and genocide claims against the United States, Commerce Department file number 150387, sent via Certified Mail Numbers 7016 2070 0000 8657 2111 and 7016 2070 0000 8657 2098 and ancestral birth records validating “American Aborigine” standing. The council herein has ordered this charter for the purpose of future incorporations and protections for the sustainable development and benefit of the people of CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA, issued and approved by said clan and subject to ratification by a vote of the members of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA Tribal Trust Council; Noticed” to and acknowledged by the United States via return receipt notice filed with the Department of Energy, Tribal and Intergovernmental Affairs, Office Of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs with Certified Mail number 770162070000086572121; END EXCERPT.
It is the intent of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA people to join indigenous families around the globe to secure and protect sacred and cultural knowledge necessary in rebuilding and perpetuating the ancient cultural ways, while exercising our right to self-determination and sustainable economic development required to sustain the bloodlines, human and cultural rights of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA people.
CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA aboriginal rights are protected as per United States Executive Order 12803 and 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881, also, United Nations Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples on 14 December 1960, UN GA/Res 1514(XV) and by provisions of customary and treaty based international law, granting the people all powers that had previously been claimed and exercised by alien peoples and their agents and assigns. Basic requirements that colonizing people transfer all powers to the colonized peoples is mandated at Article 5 of this Declaration and the affirmation of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples by the General Assembly A/61/L/67 September 7, 2007.
UNDRIP 2007 also includes: Article 37, (1)Indigenous peoples have the right to the recognition, observance and enforcement of treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements concluded with States or their successors and to have States honor and respect such treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements. (2) Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as diminishing or eliminating the rights of indigenous peoples contained in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property, per the dictates of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 17(2). Tribal Trust Charter established under the International Hague Trust Convention.
This “Constructive and Public Notice” is presented by the following appointed representative to establish this first “Public Notice” based on the abovementioned tribal declarations, and it is presumed all who take “Notice” of this “Constructive Notice” agrees with the information provided within this “Notice”. Is that not correct?
Please take Notice to the following rights and articles of Congress of the United States of America, declaring that:
INDIAN IDENTITY
§ 1903. Definitions [AMERICA INDIAN / AMERICAN ABORIGINE]
For the purposes of this chapter, except as may be specifically provided otherwise, the term—
(3) ‘‘Indian’’ means any person who is a member of an Indian tribe, or who is an Alaska
Native and a member of a Regional Corporation as defined in 1606 of title 43;
(4) ‘‘Indian child’’ means any unmarried person who is under age eighteen and is either (a) a member of an Indian tribe or (b) is eligible for membership in an Indian tribe and is the biological child of a member of an Indian tribe;
(5) ‘‘Indian child’s tribe’’ means (a) the Indian tribe in which an Indian child is a member or eligible for membership or (b), in the case of an Indian child who is a member of or eligible for membership in more than one tribe, the Indian tribe with which the Indian child has the more significant contacts;
(6) ‘‘Indian custodian’’ means any Indian person who has legal custody of an Indian child under tribal law or custom or under State law or to whom temporary physical care, custody, and control has been transferred by the parent of such child;
(7) ‘‘Indian organization’’ means any group, association, partnership, corporation, or other legal entity owned or controlled by Indians, or a majority of whose members are Indians;
(8) ‘‘Indian tribe’’ means any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community of Indians recognized as eligible for the services provided to Indians by the Secretary because of their status as Indians, including any Alaska Native village as defined in section 1602(c) of title 43;
DEFINITION TAX
A monetary charge imposed by the government on persons, entities, or property to yield public revenue. The definition of taxes, often referred to as “Cooley’s definition, characterizes taxes as contributions, imposts, duty, charges, burdens, or exactions; but the variations in phraseology are of no practical importance. Thomas M. Cooley, The law of Taxation. Blacks 5th ed. In the general since, any contribution imposed by government upon individuals, for the use and service of the state, whether under the name of toll, tribute, tallage, gabel, impost, duty, custom, excise, subsidy, aid, supply or other name. City of Newark v. Jos Hollander, Inc., 136 N.J.Eq. 539, 42. Blacks 7th, Ed.
A tax is a levy or any form of financial charge or fee, which is imposed by different central or state governments on legal entities or individuals. Taxes can also be imposed by local authorities like counties, municipal bodies, local governments or provinces. Plaintiff understands the courts issue of collecting revenue to facilitate its operations, but the request for tenured fee is clearly categorized as a “Developmental Impact Tax”, which is a fee, used infrastructure, funding government services, and because the so-called fee is used for operational purposes, such term (fee) is a tax.
There exist no tacit consent by Plaintiff to pay taxes in this instance, as such filing fee is and qualifies as a tax and as a un-contracted tribal entity, Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s tribe are identified as “Indians Not Taxed”; Kiowa Tribe of Okla. v. Manufacturing Techs., Inc., 523 U.S. 751, 754 (1998); see Bay Mills, 134 S. Ct. at 2030-2031; Oklahoma Tax Comm’n v. Citizens Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Okla., 498 U.S. 505, 509 (1991); Three Affiliated Tribes, 476 U.S. at 890-891; Santa Clara Pueblo, 436 U.S. at 58; Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game, 433 U.S. 165, 172-173 (1977). Tribal sovereign immunity applies to suits based on activities (including commercial activities) both on and off the tribe’s reservation. Bay Mills, 134 S. Ct. at 2031, 2036-2039; Kiowa, 523 U.S. at 758.
INDIANS NOT TAXED
16th amendment apportionment language recognizes the Indians not taxed exclusion, especially given that in 1913 the Indians remained not taxed, not being citizens of the United States… thus Congress have no power to lay nor collect taxes relating to Indians not taxed… whatever source does not include Indians… incomes does not include Indians…; the Court should take notice; the request of fee to acquire the government service of bringing tort against an oppressor is dual oppression against those referred to by congress as “Indians Not Taxed”.
Article 1 Section 2
Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several states which may be included within this union, according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. Section 2 excludes “Indians not taxed”; those Indians living on reservations or those roaming in unsettled areas of the country.
CENSUS BUREAU INDIANS NOT TAXED
The first federal decennial census that clearly identifies Indians is the 1860 census. The instructions to the 1860 census enumerators defined who was to be counted and who was not: Indians not taxed are not to be enumerated. The families of Indians who have renounced tribal rule, and who under state or territory laws exercise the rights of citizens, are to be enumerated. The instructions for conducting the 1880 census also include a definition for “Indians Not Taxed” and an expanded description of Indians to be enumerated: By the phrase “Indians not taxed” is meant Indians living on reservations under the care of Government agents, or roaming individually, or in bands, over unsettled tracts of country.
Indians in tribal relations, whether full-bloods or half-breeds, who are found mingled with the white population, residing in white families, engaged as servants or laborers, or living in huts or wigwams on the outskirts of towns or settlements are to be regarded as a part of the ordinary population of the country for the constitutional purpose of the apportionment of Representatives among the States, and are to be embraced in the enumeration.
The 1880 census Act clearly states that “Indians not taxed” shall be omitted from the enumeration” but then adds: the Superintendent of [the] Census may employ special agents or other means to make an enumeration of all “Indians not taxed”, within the jurisdiction of the United States, with such information as to their condition as may be obtainable. FAIR 486 F Supp at 576
The District Court has held that 26 U.S.C. § 6675 does not apply to Indian tribes because a tribe is not a “person” within the meaning of that… P.L. 101-42www.ssa.gov/OP.html. [25 U.S.C. 715a] RESTORATION OF FEDERAL RECOGNITION, RIGHTS, for the purpose of the Indian Tribal Government Tax Status Act (26 U.S.C. 7871).
It is true that ambiguous statutes and treaties are to be construed in favor of Indians, and this canon of statutory construction applies to tax exemptions. Choate v. Trapp, 224 U.S. 665, 675, 32 S.Ct. 565, 569, 56 L.Ed. 941 (1912); United States v. Anderson, 625 F.2d 910, 913 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920, 101 S.Ct. 1367, 67 L.Ed.2d 347 (1981).
The District Court has held that 26 U.S.C. § 6675 does not apply to Native American tribes because a tribe is not a “person” within the meaning of that statute. The District Court found that the statute contains no definition of “person” and turned to the Internal Revenue Code’s fallback provision, 26 U.S.C. § 7701, which provides definitions of terms to be used “where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent” of the particular statute in question. Id. § 7701(a); see also Autrey v. United States, 889 F.2d 973, 979 n.7 (11th Cir. 1989). “Person” is defined therein as follows: “The term ‘person’ shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation.” 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1).
The District Court determined that this definition does not clearly include or exclude Native American tribes, and therefore interpreted the statute in favor of the Tribe. See Hagen v. Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411 (1994) (stating that ambiguities in statutes should be resolved in favor of Native Americans); Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151, 153 (1917) (stating that tax statutes are construed liberally against the government), and such rights are found by your agency to be correct, factual and applicable to the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA; is that not correct.
In Conclusion, the appointed representative is Heretofore known as:
Lusa'Kio Yakaba
Of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA whose clan families have endured years of fraud and destruction, with forced adherence to provisions of substandard in-humane existence because of the colonizing legacy of the United States of America. The continuance of degrading standards and theft of property and culture have resulted in the near annihilation of our people physically and spiritually, and such acts are rejected by the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA people from beginning to the present.
The names, enrollment numbers, and other information provided to establish the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA Tribal Trust, established in accordance with the Hague Trust Convention, lending truth and validation of lawful and legal rights and status of the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA Tribes and clans of this Sacred Tribal Trust are the exclusive private and intellectual property of the trust.
Through the CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA Tribal Trust, all cultural and commercial activities, tribal owned lands, properties, and peoples shall be protected in accordance with Tribal Trust Charter’s Orders, Constitution, Declarations, Constructive Notices, and other lawful constructs, with mutual understanding and in harmony with the United States of America and the world. This concludes the valid and “PUBLIC NOTICE”; to your office and to the world; CUTHAUGULA COAHUILA tribe.
Minko, Lusa'Kio Yakaba